I've been pretty quiet about the whole Charlie Hebdo thing. I try not to bring those kinds of things up on this site because the news tends to promote the hell out of it, and I know you guys need a break from all of that. While it isn't worth debating that whole situation now, I do think it is interesting that the folks over at Truth About Guns did a reenactment of the event except one of the "journalists" is armed. Check out this news report:
Well, I guess they proved that one armed guy couldn't stop the terrorists. Although it isn't a one for one comparison I think it probably would have been a very different situation had one of those folks had a gun. What do you guys think? Was this test fair?